Steve Waugh … (episode 1)

sw.jpg

This may surprise a few of my friends. (Its possible to have opinions and friends).But Steve Waugh is amongst my favourite cricketers. To the point of being amongst my favourite men.

It doesn’t matter that his brother was by far the more graceful bat. To the point that there were jokes about Afghanistan. (yeah, “the forgotten waugh”, very funny, ha ha , ok?).

The man was nowhere close to perfect. And I’m not going to ask you to look at his record because when you’ll see it and try to match it against his talent or people that seemed to have more, you’ll understand how to spell grit. Actually I really like that photo above because it captures him. You can see him in it. Pads – that red hanky to help him believe in himself a bit more, and that baggy green. What else did you need?

This post is an attempt – borrowed generously from all sorts of sources – at summing up a lot of what Steve Waugh brought to Australian cricket. It’s unlikely that it will be successful in conveying it.

Its a little bit about the last Test of his career. Australia was playing India. And the final game of the series (locked 1-1) was to be played in Sydney.

As that final Test for Steve Waugh approached, many cricket writers focussed on trying to tabulate precisely what he had achieved, and though it wasn’t easy, the stats – always beloved by the cricket world – bore testimony to the fact that Steve Waugh’s command had indeed been one out of the box. He had been in charge for a total of fifty-six Tests and his side had won no fewer than forty-one of them, giving him a win rate of just over 70 per cent, which compared wonderfully well with Border’s 34 and Taylor’s 52 per cent.

One writer, Steven Lynch noted that while Waugh was ‘handed a pretty useful lineup by Mark Taylor.. nonetheless, under Waugh the team underwent a further transformation: they lost less, drew less, won even more and scored even faster than before. Thats why, although Waugh might rank behind Sachin Tendulkar and Brian Lara as batsmen pure and simple, when you add in the captaincy and character you come up with the most influential cricketer of the last decade”.

Of all the hundreds of thousands of words that were printed in Waugh valedictories though, it was Paul Keating’s former speech-writer Don Watson who perhaps got closest to defining the essence of the Steve Waugh attraction.

” He became immovable and indestructible. Fearless. That was the attraction. He was Steve Waugh and you could take it or leave it. So he was the sort of man who wouldn’t give you the skin from a grape; thats better than one who gives you the whole thing and thinks he’s bought you with it. It’s better than being a hypocrite, or a crawler, or a preacher, or a pimp, a chump or a politician etc.

“It was because he was Waugh that we forgave him things we didn’t forgive in other players; we justified them or we decided that with Waugh no justification was necessary. He claimed a catch that the cameras showed wasn’t clean. He was an inveterate, unapologetic sledger. Even his modest ardent fans suspected that once or twice he batted for his average.

“But he was Steve Waugh and we could take it or leave it, he didn’t care. Most people took it.”

And now, the end is near , and so he faced his final curtain …

And that would be Waugh, too. On the occasion of playing his last Test- with seemingly the entire world of Australian cricket awash in heavy emotion – Waugh realised one particular thing about the extraordinary outpouring of emotion across the nation. He could use it. The team could use it. There was enough force in it that it could effectively be harnessed.

No, he didn’t bang on about it at the team meeting, but he did tell them straight out.

“The crowd will be on our side,’ he said. ‘Lets just use it to our advantage”.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Steve Waugh … (episode 1)

  1. Well, I have a different opinion of the guy.. Maybe because I am not an oz.. One look at the captains list – Border/ Taylor/ Waugh/Ponting.. well its a trend for sure.. Negative correlation in terms of results to popularity (outside oz land)..
    I know I know.. people will say its a sport, its results that matter.. But one just has to look at the spontaneous ovation(hehe) that Pricky got when he walked out to bat against the WI in the champions trophy final at Brebourne. For the record, he got out on the 2nd ball he faced AND he got even bigger claps when walking back.
    Waugh was/is an over rated cricketer and captain.. Maybe its a sentimental view but I wish to put it on record -)

  2. Rahul’s the reason I wrote the “opinions and friends” bit in that post 🙂
    But seriously, 41 Test victories in 56 Tests? Think about that.
    You’re right about a lot of things about him – and to be fair to me (ha !) the post does mention a few. But no, I did not mention that of the 27 run-outs that he was involved, Steve Waugh was the guy walking back only four times. I hid that part shamelessly
    But there are a lot of other things about the guy I did not mention either.
    I think people who call him over-rated are the ones who give him the biggest compliment of all. Because thats acknowledging that the guy did not have the talent – but yet achieved.
    Unless you mean it another way?

  3. It always seems hard to compliment and praise an arrogant Aussie. I never was much of a fan of Steve Waugh, as you couldn’t warm to him but I have to admit that even I admire the guy, and can only now appreciate what he achieved surrounded by his more talented team mates. He had guts, character and self belief in abundance.

    I know what you mean about ‘opinions and friends’!

  4. Rashmika,
    I agree completely with what you say. There is a lot of truth to the starting block of an arrogant aussie bit that you and Rahul talk about which makes one almost reluctant to admire what they achieve.
    But the truth is that Steve Waugh chased everything with such singleminded and dogged determination and such ruthlessness, that the “aussie” way is now almost considered an essential ingredient of winning.
    That was something which he had more than any of his other far more talented teammates. And the reason that he won so much more.
    He was in many ways a real sonofa – but then like the piece says, if my captain got me that record, I’d probably take it…

  5. yes so did Ganguly but look at what he got from the ozs.. they can never take it back can they.. the oz way of winning is .. if we win other people are great.. if we lose other people suck ala Ganguly.. I can still rememeber the way Ian spoke about him after the toss..

  6. One thing I admire about the guy was that he had the guts to give you a follow on… A privky doesn’t ensure it even if you have a 400 run leas ala the ashes

  7. And then again Rahul, what will – and should – be remembered is not that someone did not have the gonads to enforce a follow on after a 400 run lead (blame it on a childhood trauma suffered in calcutta) – but that he won you the Ashes 5-0.
    I’d forgive my captain most things with that and a world cup – and i am not even close to oz.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s